Democracy, liberal 369
Ideology, theocratic 369
Journalism, bad 374, patriotic 368,
Language, miss-use of 369
Whatever our feelings on the matter we have now left the E.U. Due to a combination of apathy and confusion, it could be argued that U.K democracy has been in decline over the last 20 years. It is now certain that British voters are now responsible for whatever fate the future holds in store for us.
A few facts.
The Conservative and Unionist Party had 635 candidates in the 2019 election.
It has 161,000 members.
161,000 / 635 = 254
In England the median electorate in a constituency is 72,000
If, as I was led to believe local members choose the candidates that represent them, this is both interesting and worrying. Mathew Parris wrote in the Spectator “Eight reasons why I know why I’m a Conservative”.
Although I don’t agree with every word used I think it is a useful summary of what a vast majority of Conservative voters believe.
If you concerned about these values, democracy and your pension, membership of the Conservative and Unionist Party is £25.00
If you have just received your A level results £5.00
Just one more thing. If a Conservative movement sprang up to halt our slide into the abyss it would need a catchy name.
It is said you can divide the British population into those who trust The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and those that don’t. However whichever side you are on, I think you can agree that the best Teachers have had to go on is a vague statement that they should start bringing back children on 1st June. There are no data that I have seen which can be used as evidence. So I am disappointed to give the first public model of the risks involved in going back to school. My working out is going to be riddled with false assumptions. I apologise for inconsistent rounding before the final stage of the calculations. This is due to the fact the numbers are all very speculative and all I want to do is create is a polemic about how we can calculate the risk.
Isle of Sheppey has approximately 3750 primary children. For the only school on the island that I could find with the proportion per class they are evenly spread out through the age range, so 7 groups and 3 going back equals 1600. With 1 adult per 10 children this gives about 1800 souls.
Now here come some more big assumptions. Given an r of about o.8 and 208.1 (a degree of accuracy I would not use) per 100,000 in Swale confirmed positive and also 40 % of cases asymptomatic. I will assume the 208 are self-isolating but they will have passed it on to 0.8*208 = 166
208/60*40 =173 these 173 are still at large and could have passed it on to 0.8*173 = 138
For a total of 166+173+138 = 477 per 100,000 gives 477/100000 * 1800 = 9 infections in the new school population.
This actually nicely works out as 1 per school. But as the schools are different sizes I will work it out per class of 10. 10 given the size of a classroom, is the only number I think a possibility of non-transmission could occur.
So 9/160 = 0.06. So 6% of classes would have an infection. Another big assumption, that of passing it on to your child or teacher in the month, say 20%, this gives a 0.06*0.2= 0.012 chance of your child or teacher catching SARS CoV-2. 1 in a hundred. Now this risk will have to be weighed according to your family. I.e. ages, risk groups etc.
For me a 55-year-old male. 246,406 confirmed positive with 40% asymptomatic gives 410,676 cases. In my age group 2547 deaths gives 2547/410676= 0.006 chance of dying if infected. In this simple example I will ignore getting significant organ damage.
So 0.012*0.006 = 0.000072 chance of death in that month due to Covid 19
What does this mean? Risk of death UK in a year driving 0.000059 so about an order of magnitude (12) more risky. Although better than when my partner is driving. As the odds of dying in a vehicle accident are already considered high, these odds do not seem good. http://www.bandolier.org.uk/booth/Risk/trasnsportpop.html
Since completing these calculations I think it is interesting that I now have some degree of knowledge about the risks. I am also feeling a sense of shame that I have had to work it out on my old Casio rather than get the data from our Government.
This is Keir Starmer’s actual quote from the same document. With the preceding sentence.
Facemasks are only recommended to be worn by infected individuals when advised by a healthcare worker, to reduce the risk of transmitting the infection to other people. It remains very unlikely that people receiving care in a care home or the community will become infected.
Mr Starmer’s main point is that the PM said that this was not the advice.
Very fine lines here. However, I have heard right from the beginning that care homes were seen as a great difficulty in this epidemic. The big issue for me would be testing. Why since SARS were we not able to react to CoV-2. Why did Jeremy Hunt not enlighten the Science enquiry when he had the chance.
The letter Keir Starmer wrote to does raise questions, although it is a selective quote. Here it is in full.
This guidance is intended for the current position in the UK where there is currently no transmission of COVID-19 in the community. It is therefore very unlikely that anyone receiving care in a care home or the community will become infected. This is the latest information and will be updated shortly.
Now this remained on the Gov web site at least until 12 March when there were 1580 cases reported.
So was advice changed but not updated on the web site? However, any professional reading this on 12 March would have known about possible transmission in the community and therefore there could be infections.